Re: Fillet Problem
Delete all the rounds you have posted in the images and make just one continious round on the edge of the cylinder from the first image. It looks like 3 mm? Does it continue all the way around the...
View ArticleRe: Fillet Problem
Sometimes you have to sneak up on the right solution. Sometimes there is an alternate solution you can choose. If you want the same termination on the rib as the one on the right, I suggest putting...
View ArticleHow do we make our own Web Links that work like the Integrity Web Links?
Hi. We have code for creating web links that works "kind of". See the code snippet below. When a user is using the Web Client, and they click on a link created by the interntals of Integrity, the user...
View ArticleRe: Fillet Problem
I don't use multiple round sets in one feature unless I need it. I find multiple round features gives me a little more flexibility. I'd use 3 features for this area. I'd round the end of the cylinder...
View ArticleRe: Windchill 10.2 M020 and Java 8
I think you should simply try out whether it works by replacing the jdk within the Windchill installation. In the past we also ran windchill with a newer jdk even if it was not "supported" by PTC which...
View ArticleRe: Windchill 10.1 to 10.2 is it a update or Upgrade?
Its an upgrade as you can't simply run the ptc solution installer to update the existing installation. You will have to set up a target system, run the upgrade manager to update your database. Copy...
View ArticleExport to Word - problem with field Expected Results
Hi, I'm trying to export a Test Suite and its Test Cases into a DOCX file with the gateway export wizard.I succeed in displaying each test cases of my test suite like this : id - Text - Category...
View ArticleClik here to view.
No properly tagged Prime variables found - Creo 3.0 MathCAD Express Prime 3.0
When setting up Prime Analysis in Creo 3.0, attempting to list Prime input/output returns the error "No properly tagged Prime variables found".Variables have been set up in a pre-existing *.mcdx file...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: polyroots + units = error?
Werner Exinger wrote: .... If you supply km (or m, it doesn't matter) you get the correct result.Better - nanotechnology! :
View ArticleRe: I want to identify wheter it is right
I forgot CL, CD value definition.CL is 1.04, CD is 0.08
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: I want to identify wheter it is right
Can it be that part of your homework is that you get yourself familiar with Mathcad? You sure haven't done that part as thourogh as you should have done and I strongly suggest that you catch up on...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Hole problem/issue
I gave this option a try in assembly mode. I created a sketch on each part at the assembly level using various references; both part and assembly. Sketch 1, 2 and 3 have geometry points fully...
View ArticleCode for renaming EPMDoc Number and Filename
I'm using the code shown in PTC CS150421 to rename (number and filename) for CADDocs. EPMDocumentMasterIdentity masterIdentity = (EPMDocumentMasterIdentity)master.getIdentificationObject();...
View ArticleRe: I want to identify wheter it is right
Thank you for advice.Actually, I can't understand well. But I think to know what i can do. I am trying to solve my work. But I don't know well why degree is weird.I attached my file. I want to know the...
View ArticleRe: I want to identify wheter it is right
You jump from one question to the next without solving the former quicker than I can follow. You still are not willing to engage in Mathcad's basics and still use ranges where you should use vectors,...
View ArticleRe: damaged file
Yes, I can!Can you help me to send me a digital copy of Mathcad Plus 6 Professional Edition User's Guide and the respective Refernce Guide? RegardsCeia Simões
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Fix displacement in only +ve direction for non-linear analysis?
I'm a little confused on what your analysis setup is suppose to be for the assembly level or what the goals of the analysis are (stress, displacement, etc.). Could you put something together describing...
View ArticleRe: Simple moment applied to shaft, all rotational calcs = 0.00000
I'm using 79.3 MPa for my shear modulus since all my dimensions are in mm. The part is forged steel. I'm guessing you meant to say 79.3 GPa (not MPa). With this assumption, and the following...
View ArticleRe: Simple moment applied to shaft, all rotational calcs = 0.00000
Your question got me thinking and the Shear modulus is 79.3GPa actually. I was using 79.3 MPa because of my mm units. But I believe now that I should have been using 79.3 kPa (N/mm^2). When I change...
View ArticleRe: Simple moment applied to shaft, all rotational calcs = 0.00000
OK, although I'm a little surprised that the difference between your hand calc and Simulate is that much (~6%) given how simple the problem is. BTW, N/mm^2 is MPa not kPa (N/mm^2 = N/(1e-3m)^2 =...
View Article